|
|

Student-Centered Learning
Student-Centered Learning
The flexible delivery of course material in an online course enables students to learn in their own way, at their own time and pace, and allows students to be involved in the key decisions about their learning.
Student-centered online courses:
- utilize courseware management systems that allow student independence;
- provide for self-assessment opportunities;
- include multi-tiered, hypertextual (hyperlinks) organization of content to accommodate student's abilities and interests;
- have effective communication systems for discussion among students and between students and instructors;
- include highly interactive and stimulating learning materials; and
- use effective assessment mechanisms
- allow students to create individually tailored paths to master the instructional goals, moving at their own speed and retrieving additional information as needed.
|
The ability of online instruction to facilitate student-centered learning is one factor that is contributing to its rapid growth, as educators recognize the value of students' active involvement in the learning process.
|
Self-Directed Learning
In "Developing Learner Self-Direction in a Webcentric Learning Environment," Rita-Marie Conrad states that students who excel at distance learning can be characterized as "self-directed," that is:
- they work well in isolation
- they have time management skills
- they set goals for themselves
- they self-evaluate
- they make use of available educational resources (109).
How can an instructor help students advance as self-directed learners? Conrad provides the following table.
|
|
Self-Direction Stage
|
Instructional Strategies
|
Tools/Method
|
| Stage 1 - Dependent |
- Provide timely feedback on assignments
- State expectations early in the course
- Structure content so that it can easily be followed
|
- Email--Be very explicit in instructions, in order to reduce learners' anxiety
- A thorough syllabus; either posted to the web, emailed, or located in the Discussion Area
- Introductory email, discussion or chat.
|
| Stage 2 - Interested |
- Progressively decrease the student's dependency on the instructor
- Provide opportunities for reflective thought
|
- Begin to assign instructional roles to student
- Have students keep an online journal
|
| Stage 3 - Involved |
- Build a sense of community
- Have students give feedback on peers' projects and papers
|
- Assign peer reviews
- Provide material in the discussion area and ask (or require) student participation
- Begin collaborative projects
|
| Stage 4 - Self Directed |
- Learners design and develop activities
- Learners "get a say" in the learning process...State their goals, and evaluate themselves
- Expert resources are utilized
|
- Have students begin discussions and then facilitate them
- Assign collaborative projects
- Assign self-directed projects
- Have students complete an "Ask an Expert" activity
|
| Conrad, Rita-Maire. "Developing Learner Self-Direction in a Webcentric Learning Environment." Presentation. 15th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. 1999. |
In a student-centered course, differing learning styles are accommodated, as students take advantage of multimedia components of online courses, collaborate either synchronously or asynchronously with other students and instructors, and receive course content in the most comfortable manner available (reading online vs. file download and printing.) Learning styles are addressed in Lesson 2. |
|
|
Levels of
Performance
Charlotte Danielson provides the
following levels of performance for elements of student-centered
courses:
| |
Unsatisfactory |
Basic |
Proficient |
Distinguished |
|
Element |
|
|
|
|
| Quality of Discussion Questions |
confusing or poorly worded; do not encourage responses |
some questions invite limited responses |
high quality; adequate time is available for student
responses |
high quality; adequate time is available for student responses;
students formulate their own questions |
| Discussion Techniques |
interaction is predominantly recitation style |
some attempt is made to engage students in a true discussion, with
uneven results |
interaction; true discussion, instructor steps aside when
appropriate |
students assume considerable responsibility for the success of
discussions, initiating topics and making unsolicited
contributions. |
| Student Participation in
Discussions |
few students participate |
instructor attempts to engage students, with limited success |
instructor successfully engages all students |
students themselves ensure that all voices are
heard |
| Learning Activities |
activities are not suitable for students or instructional goals;
activities do not follow an organized progression |
some suitable activities; progression of activities is
uneven |
most activities are suitable, progression of activities is fairly
even |
activities are highly relevant to students and instructional goals;
activities progress coherently |
| Instructional Materials and
Resources |
materials do not support the instructional goals or engage students in
meaningful learning |
some material supports instructional goals; some success in engaging the
student |
all materials support instructional goals; most materials engage
students |
all materials support instructional goals; most materials engage
students; evidence of student participation in selecting or adapting
materials |
| Lessons and Course Structure |
no
clearly defined structure; time allocations are unrealistic |
recognizable structure in place, but not uniformly
maintained |
clearly defined structure in place |
clearly defined structure in place; content is multi-tiered and
hypertextual, allowing for differing student
needs |
| Danielson, Charlotte.
Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching.
1999. |
|
|